P931 Burden of disease among Ulcerative Colitis patients with isolated proctitis in the United States and Europe
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Isolated proctitis (IP), or ulcerative proctitis, a subtype of ulcerative colitis (UC), is associated with distressing symptoms such as abdominal pain and bowel urgency. As patients with IP not responding to conventional treatment are understudied and underrepresented in clinical trials, treatment guidance is limited. We aimed to understand disease burden among IP patients by describing patients delineated by disease extension and treatment experience. Methods Data were drawn from the Adelphi UC Disease Specific Programme™, a cross-sectional survey of gastroenterologists (GIs) and their consulting patients in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom and the United States from October 2020 – March 2021. GIs reported patient demographics, disease extension, symptoms, components of the full Mayo score (allowing total scores to be calculated for patients), and treatment profile at time of consultation. Patients with a history of physician-assessed moderate-severe disease were included. Patients were categorised as IP (IP at diagnosis and consultation) or as more extensive UC (MEUC; where disease extended beyond IP at both diagnosis and consultation). According to ECCO consensus guidelines1, patients are considered refractory if they have failed oral steroids combined with oral and rectal 5-ASA therapy. In this analysis, non-refractory IP patients had only received 5-ASAs and/or steroids; refractory IP patients had received an immunomodulator (IM) and/or advanced therapy (AT; biologics, Janus kinase inhibitors). All analyses were descriptive. Results Overall, 221 IP patients (118 non-refractory, 103 refractory) and 1607 MEUC were analysed (Table 1). Among IP, non-refractory IP, refractory IP, and MEUC 49.3%, 55.1%, 42.7%, and 55.4% were male, respectively, and mean age ranged 39.0-40.2 years. Symptoms most reported by IP, non-refractory IP, refractory IP, and MEUC patients were abdominal pain (33.8%, 26.5%, 41.7%, 26.0%), fatigue/tiredness (22.7%, 20.4%, 25.2%, 23.8%) and bowel urgency (22.7%, 25.7%, 19.4%, 23.6%). According to Mayo scores at consultation, 40.3% of IP, 44.9% of non-refractory IP, 34.9% of refractory IP, and 50.4% of MEUC patients were in remission. Since diagnosis, 33.5% of IP, 71.8% of refractory IP, and 69.1% of MEUC cohorts had received AT. Conclusion Patients with IP experience a similar symptom burden to the MEUC population, despite currently available treatments for UC. The high AT use and low rate of remission indicates undertreatment of IP patients and a need for therapies with proven efficacy in this population, particularly after conventional therapy use. 1. Harbord et al. J Crohns Colitis. 2017 Jul 1;11(7):769-784.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".