MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391161955 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.1129

P999 First in human treatment of Crohn’s disease with autologous ex-vivo expanded polyclonal, gut-targeted regulatory T cells: Initial results of the TRIBUTE feasibility study

2024· article· en· W4391161955 on OpenAlexaff
Peter M. Irving, D Seah, Andrea Centritto, Jennifer Clough, James B. Canavan, Rimma Goldberg, A Toby Prevost, Joana C. Vasconcelos, Mike Lyne, J Palmer Joyce, P Patel, Séverine Tasker, Peter Marks, B Rodger, Ian Jackson, Derek C. Macallan, M Ong, Megan Sutcliffe, Mark A. Travis, Graham M. Lord

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and ImmunitySt. Thomas Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEx vivoPolyclonal antibodiesCrohn's diseaseImmunologyDiseaseTributeMedicineIn vivoBiologyInternal medicineBiotechnologyAntibodyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Despite the increase in novel medications for Crohn’s disease (CD), many patients either fail to respond adequately to, or are intolerant of current drugs. Cell therapies have yet to have a significant impact in IBD but represent a potential novel treatment option. Regulatory T-cells (Tregs) play a key role in immune homeostasis, and Treg dysfunction is implicated in the pathogenesis of CD. Their therapeutic potential has not been assessed in humans with CD. We designed a Phase 1b study to explore the feasibility of using novel, autologous, ex-vivo expanded, gut-homing Tregs as a treatment for CD. Methods The TRIBUTE feasibility study aimed to treat 4 patients with treatment-refractory, moderate to severe CD (CDAI 220-450 and endoscopic ulceration) with a single dose of 3-5x106 cells/kg of TR004, an autologous cell product comprising CD4+CD25+CD127lowCD45RA+ Tregs expanded ex-vivo in the presence of an agonist that increases the expression of a4b7, priming the cells for gut homing. Deuteration during expansion allowed for cell tracking. Primary outcomes were dose-limiting toxicity by week 5, feasibility of recruitment to and retention in the study, successful expansion of the cells and successful dosing. Colonoscopy was performed at screening and at week (wk) 8 and disease activity (CDAI and biomarkers) was assessed at wk 0,1,2,3,5 and 8. Safety follow up is planned to wk 104. Results 5 patients (3 male, median age 36 (range 24-39), median failed advanced therapies 3 (2-4)) were screened. In 1 patient, cells failed at day 21 of expansion due to human error requiring the patient to be replaced. Of the 4 patients with successful expansion of cells, after 23-30 days of expansion, median b7 expression was 98% (92-99%) and cell viability was 91% (84-94%). Median fold expansion was 254 (32-578). 3 patients received a dose of TR004 and attended all study visits, the other patient being withdrawn prior to dosing due to pregnancy after contraceptive failure. No dose-limiting toxicities occurred. 1 patient, with long standing colonic CD and PSC, had dysplasia identified at the wk 8 colonoscopy and underwent colectomy at wk 20. 1 patient started oral prednisolone at wk 6 for active disease. In the 3 patients who were dosed, median CDAI was: wk0: 357, wk1: 295, wk2: 207, wk3: 218, wk5: 200 and wk8: 208. (Figure 1a). SES-CD was unchanged from screening to week 8 (Figure 1b). Conclusion In this first in human study we demonstrated that treatment with a novel cell product comprising autologous, ex-vivo expanded, gut-homing Tregs, is feasible in patients with CD. No dose limiting toxicity was identified. Clinical and endoscopic changes should be interpreted with caution in such small numbers of patients. There is a rationale to proceed to Ph2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and ColitisSame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207