MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391162371 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0642

P512 Early proactive therapeutic drug monitoring with ustekinumab therapy in paediatric Crohn's Disease

2024· article· en· W4391162371 on OpenAlexaffabout
Amanda Ricciuto, Hayley E. McKay, Jennifer deBruyn, Eileen Crowley, Peter Church, Hien Q. Huynh, Anthony Otley, Abdul Sattar Shaikh, Eytan Wine, Thomas D. Walters, Anne M. Griffiths

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WinnipegUniversity of ManitobaIzaak Walton Killam Health CentreLondon Health Sciences CentreUniversity of Alberta HospitalUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of CalgaryHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUstekinumabMedicineCrohn's diseaseTherapeutic drug monitoringDrugDiseaseIntensive care medicineInternal medicinePharmacologyAdalimumab

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background In the treatment of paediatric Crohn’s disease (CD), the youngest (lightest) children have historically been underdosed by standard weight-based dosing. Paediatric data on optimal dosing and drug levels are sparse. We aimed to examine real-world post-induction pharmacokinetic and effectiveness in a prospective multicentre paediatric CD cohort. Methods Luminal CD patients 2-17 years old in the Canadian Children IBD Network were eligible if they received UST IV and had a serum UST level measured proactively at week (wk) 8. Wk8 and subsequent UST levels were compared between children <40 and ≥40 kg (Mann-Whitney-U), dosed in accordance with an ongoing phase 3 paediatric trial. We calculated a “dose to exposure ratio” by dividing induction dose by wk8 level. Clinical remission was defined as wPCDAI <12.5 while still on UST. We used ROC curves to define optimal (Youden index) wk8 levels associated with wk16 remission and subsequent UST continuation. Continuous measures are reported as median (IQR). Results 44 children were eligible from April 2017-April 2023 (70% M; age 13.1 (10.8-15.5) y; disease duration 0.3 (0.08-1.3) y; weight 44.7 (30.4-55.0) kg, 12 <40kg; 75% bio-naïve; L1 18%, L2 23%, L3 52%; SES-CD at diagnosis 17 (11-21)). At UST start, wPCDAI was 27.5 (10-52.5) and albumin was similar between weight groups (p=0.3). Median follow-up was 10 (7-13) months. 68% received 260 mg IV loading dose, 16% 390 mg. All received 90 mg SC q8 weekly maintenance. Induction doses in mg/kg and mg/m2 were significantly higher in children <40 kg (Table 1). Despite this, wk8 levels were similar between weight groups, with the same pattern at other times. The dose (mg/kg) to exposure ratio was 1.45x higher in children <40kg, indicating they received more drug per unit increase in serum UST level relative to heavier children. Interval shortening to q4wk occurred in 7 prior to wk16, and in 16 (36%) by 6 months. By wk16, 56% of patients with available wPCDAI were in clinical remission and 60% at 1 year. Overall, 7 (16%) ceased UST. Wk8 UST levels were numerically higher in those who achieved wk16 clinical remission (7.4 (6.2-10.2) vs. 5.5 (2.6-7.1), p=0.094), and numerically lower in those who ceased UST (4.9 (2.6-6.9) vs. 7.3 (5.4-10.7), p=0.087). Based on ROC, the optimal wk8 UST level associated with wk16 clinical remission was 5.8 (AUC 0.68, sensitivity 78%, specificity 57%). The optimal level associated with UST continuation was 7.9 (AUC 0.73, sensitivity 43%, specificity 100%, Figure 1). Conclusion Paediatric CD patients weighing <40kg required higher UST doses to achieve comparable drug exposure to those ≥40kg. Positive clinical outcomes were associated with higher UST levels (with optimal cut-offs 6-8). Figure 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and ColitisSame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207