HyperTRCSS: A hyperspectral time-resolved compressive sensing spectrometer for depth-sensitive monitoring of cytochrome-c-oxidase and blood oxygenation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Significance: Hyperspectral time-resolved (TR) near-infrared spectroscopy offers the potential to monitor cytochrome-c-oxidase (oxCCO) and blood oxygenation in the adult brain with minimal scalp/skull contamination. We introduce a hyperspectral TR spectrometer that uses compressive sensing to minimize acquisition time without compromising spectral range or resolution and demonstrate oxCCO and blood oxygenation monitoring in deep tissue. Aim: Develop a hyperspectral TR compressive sensing spectrometer and use it to monitor oxCCO and blood oxygenation in deep tissue. Approach: Homogeneous tissue-mimicking phantom experiments were conducted to confirm the spectrometer's sensitivity to oxCCO and blood oxygenation. Two-layer phantoms were used to evaluate the spectrometer's sensitivity to oxCCO and blood oxygenation in the bottom layer through a 10 mm thick static top layer. Results: The spectrometer was sensitive to oxCCO and blood oxygenation changes in the bottom layer of the two-layer phantoms, as confirmed by concomitant measurements acquired directly from the bottom layer. Measures of oxCCO and blood oxygenation by the spectrometer were highly correlated with "gold standard" measures in the homogeneous and two-layer phantom experiments. Conclusions: The results show that the hyperspectral TR compressive sensing spectrometer is sensitive to changes in oxCCO and blood oxygenation in deep tissue through a thick static top layer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".