MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391162826 · doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.3c00629

Targeted Mass Spectrometry of Longitudinal Patient Sera Reveals LTBP1 as a Potential Surveillance Biomarker for High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma

2024· article· en· W4391162826 on OpenAlexafffund
Deborah Wenk, Shahbaz Khan, Vladimir Ignatchenko, Taymaa May, Marcus Q. Bernardini, Thomas Kislinger

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Proteome Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanada Research ChairsOntario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care
KeywordsSerous carcinomaOvarian cancerBiomarkerOncologySerous fluidOvarian carcinomaInternal medicineDiseaseMedicineTIMP1CancerBiologyGene expressionGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSC) is the most prevalent subtype of epithelial ovarian cancer. The combination of a high rate of recurrence and novel therapies in HGSC necessitates an accurate assessment of the disease. Currently, HGSC response to treatment and recurrence are monitored via immunoassay of serum levels of the glycoprotein CA125. CA125 levels predictably rise at HGSC recurrence; however, it is likely that the disease is progressing even before it is detectable through CA125. This may explain why treating solely based on CA125 increase has not been associated with improved outcomes. Thus, additional biomarkers that monitor HGSC progression and cancer recurrence are needed. For this purpose, we developed a scheduled parallel reaction monitoring mass spectrometry (PRM-MS) assay for the quantification of four previously identified HGSC-derived glycopeptides (from proteins FGL2, LGALS3BP, LTBP1, and TIMP1). We applied the assay to quantify their longitudinal expression profiles in 212 serum samples taken from 34 HGSC patients during disease progression. Analyses revealed that LTBP1 best-mirrored tumor load, dropping as a result of cancer treatment in 31 out of 34 patients and rising at HGSC recurrence in 28 patients. Additionally, LTBP1 rose earlier during remission than CA125 in 11 out of 25 platinum-sensitive patients with an average lead time of 116.4 days, making LTBP1 a promising candidate for monitoring of HGSC recurrence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.637

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Proteome ResearchSame topicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins ResearchFrench-language works237,207