Targeted Mass Spectrometry of Longitudinal Patient Sera Reveals LTBP1 as a Potential Surveillance Biomarker for High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSC) is the most prevalent subtype of epithelial ovarian cancer. The combination of a high rate of recurrence and novel therapies in HGSC necessitates an accurate assessment of the disease. Currently, HGSC response to treatment and recurrence are monitored via immunoassay of serum levels of the glycoprotein CA125. CA125 levels predictably rise at HGSC recurrence; however, it is likely that the disease is progressing even before it is detectable through CA125. This may explain why treating solely based on CA125 increase has not been associated with improved outcomes. Thus, additional biomarkers that monitor HGSC progression and cancer recurrence are needed. For this purpose, we developed a scheduled parallel reaction monitoring mass spectrometry (PRM-MS) assay for the quantification of four previously identified HGSC-derived glycopeptides (from proteins FGL2, LGALS3BP, LTBP1, and TIMP1). We applied the assay to quantify their longitudinal expression profiles in 212 serum samples taken from 34 HGSC patients during disease progression. Analyses revealed that LTBP1 best-mirrored tumor load, dropping as a result of cancer treatment in 31 out of 34 patients and rising at HGSC recurrence in 28 patients. Additionally, LTBP1 rose earlier during remission than CA125 in 11 out of 25 platinum-sensitive patients with an average lead time of 116.4 days, making LTBP1 a promising candidate for monitoring of HGSC recurrence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".