MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391164300 · doi:10.1109/jestie.2024.3355885

Enhancing Fault Ride Through Capability of Grid-Forming Virtual Synchronous Generators Using Model Predictive Control

2024· article· en· W4391164300 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Industrial Electronics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGridModel predictive controlFault (geology)Computer scienceControl (management)Control engineeringDistributed computingReliability engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligenceGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a control method for virtual synchronous generator (VSG)-based grid-forming converters to improve the stability of power electronic-dominated power grids. Overcurrent protection and fault ride-through (FRT) are crucial for the control of converter-based generators, given the limitations of power electronics components. This paper introduces a finite-set model predictive control (FS-MPC)-based FRT control technique that ensures system stability during symmetrical and asymmetrical fault types by incorporating overcurrent protection and contribution to the system voltage, while maintaining the voltage mode functionalities of the grid-forming converters. Compared to conventional control methods, the proposed MPC control technique allows for faster and improved dynamics, which makes control objectives more accessible. Additionally, the approach coordinates voltage and current control and their limitations to ensure system stability during and after fault. The proposed method also adapts to different fault types and sizes without requiring fault type detection. Simulation results in MATLAB/Simulink illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed control method in limiting the current and ensuring high power quality by providing clean sinusoidal voltage and current waveforms. Hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) real-time simulation is also presented to validate the controller performance under fault conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.210
Threshold uncertainty score0.795

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it