MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391167238 · doi:10.61411/rsc202422017

Revisão de Textos Acadêmicos de Obras Hollywoodianas

2024· article· pt· W4391167238 on OpenAlexaff
Roberto Minadeo

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Sociedade Científica · 2024
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPhysical Education and Sports Studies
Canadian institutionsCégep de l'Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O presente artigo realizou uma revisão de artigos acadêmicos centrados em obras cinematográficas ou em artistas. Também algumas poucas dissertações foram vistas, ao lado de um Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso. Saem do escopo desta pesquisa textos que comparam filmes diversos, fazem paralelismos entre filmes com outras obras de arte ou que fazem digressões de cunho filosófico, social, político ou histórico a partir de obras fílmicas. O objetivo foi compreender com maior profundidade tais obras. Filmes ou artistas que receberam a atenção de mais de uma visão acadêmica são ocasião de análise mais rica no texto.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.547
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Sociedade CientíficaSame topicPhysical Education and Sports StudiesFrench-language works237,207