MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391168931 · doi:10.1080/00036846.2024.2305620

Labour market mismatches in G7 countries: a fractional integration approach

2024· article· en· W4391168931 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Luis A. Gil‐Alana, María Jesús González-Blanch, Carlos Poza

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Economics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMonetary Policy and Economic Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónMinisterio de Asuntos Económicos y Transformación Digital, Gobierno de EspañaEuropean Regional Development FundUniversidad Francisco de Vitoria
KeywordsEconomicsEconometricsMathematical economicsMacroeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper examines the G7 labour market, analysing unemployment, job vacancies and the spread of both in terms of time series persistence from January 2002 to October 2023. Using fractional integration, we observe the series show long memory and persistence in all G7 countries. These findings differ slightly depending on the specification of the error term. If it is white noise, no evidence of mean reversion is found in any scenario except for US unemployment. With autocorrelated disturbances, mean reversion is found in unemployment rates in Canada, Germany, and the US. In France, this is the case for job vacancies, and in France and Italy, for spread. The UK is the only country that does not display any degree of reversion to the mean in the three series examined. Our results show evidence of a downward trend for unemployment and an upward trend for job vacancies in all G7 countries. Consequently, the reduction of the imbalance unemployment-vacancies seems permanent, which is a positive outcome for advanced economies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.755
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied EconomicsSame topicMonetary Policy and Economic ImpactFrench-language works237,207