MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391176274 · doi:10.3917/reco.745.0681

Credit Market Imperfections, Urban Land Rents and the Henry George Theorem

2024· article· fr· W4391176274 on OpenAlexaff
R. Brunetti, Carl Gaigné, Fabien Moizeau

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue économique · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHousing Market and Economics
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeorge (robot)Economic rentEconomicsPolitical scienceHumanitiesEconomyPhilosophyArtMarket economy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article étudie l’impact du marché du crédit sur les prix du foncier et ses implications en termes de politiques fiscales. Nous introduisons un coût à l’emprunt et une contrainte d’apport personnel dans le modèle standard d’économie urbaine. Ces imperfections s’avèrent réduire les prix de la terre dans les localisations les plus attractives. Cette baisse est d’autant plus forte que les terres sont rares et les villes peuplées et dotées d’infrastructures de transport inefficaces. La contrainte d’apport personnel peut générer des écarts d’utilités d’équilibre entre des ménages initialement homogènes. Le théorème d’Henry George, selon lequel une taxe confisquant les rentes foncières suffit à financer les biens publics, doit être amendé en présence de contraintes de crédit. Pour chaque type d’imperfections du marché du crédit, nous proposons un système de taxation optimale .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue économiqueSame topicHousing Market and EconomicsFrench-language works237,207