Bibliographic record
Abstract
Des aspects socioculturels (socialisation familiale, perception dominante du corps féminin, espaces genrés) contribuent à l’explication du faible taux de pratique sportive des femmes marocaines, notamment dans certains sports considérés comme « masculins ». À partir d’une enquête qualitative réalisée auprès d’un groupe de jeunes footballeuses âgées de 14 à 20 ans, de leurs proches et des responsables d’associations sportives, cet article analyse les modes de socialisation, les perceptions du corps et la construction des dispositions « masculines » dans deux quartiers populaires défavorisés dans la périphérie de Rabat. Dans ces quartiers, le football féminin est fréquemment considéré comme une pratique qui va à l’encontre des normes dominantes risquant de modifier l’hexis corporelle des filles. En parallèle, l’apparence masculine de certaines footballeuses est interprétée parfois comme une « perte de féminité » et interroge la binarité du genre tant dans les quartiers étudiés qu’au sein de la société. Par conséquent, l’engagement sportif de ces jeunes footballeuses se négocie en marge des conventions dominantes de genre.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".