Invasive growth of brain metastases is linked to CHI3L1 release from pSTAT3-positive astrocytes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Compared to minimally invasive brain metastases (MI BrM), highly invasive (HI) lesions form abundant contacts with cells in the peritumoral brain parenchyma and are associated with poor prognosis. Reactive astrocytes (RAs) labeled by phosphorylated STAT3 (pSTAT3) have recently emerged as a promising therapeutic target for BrM. Here, we explore whether the BrM invasion pattern is influenced by pSTAT3+ RAs and may serve as a predictive biomarker for STAT3 inhibition. METHODS: We used immunohistochemistry to identify pSTAT3+ RAs in HI and MI human and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) BrM. Using PDX, syngeneic, and transgenic mouse models of HI and MI BrM, we assessed how pharmacological STAT3 inhibition or RA-specific STAT3 genetic ablation affected BrM growth in vivo. Cancer cell invasion was modeled in vitro using a brain slice-tumor co-culture assay. We performed single-cell RNA sequencing of human BrM and adjacent brain tissue. RESULTS: RAs expressing pSTAT3 are situated at the brain-tumor interface and drive BrM invasive growth. HI BrM invasion pattern was associated with delayed growth in the context of STAT3 inhibition or genetic ablation. We demonstrate that pSTAT3+ RAs secrete Chitinase 3-like-1 (CHI3L1), which is a known STAT3 transcriptional target. Furthermore, single-cell RNA sequencing identified CHI3L1-expressing RAs in human HI BrM. STAT3 activation, or recombinant CHI3L1 alone, induced cancer cell invasion into the brain parenchyma using a brain slice-tumor plug co-culture assay. CONCLUSIONS: Together, these data reveal that pSTAT3+ RA-derived CHI3L1 is associated with BrM invasion, implicating STAT3 and CHI3L1 as clinically relevant therapeutic targets for the treatment of HI BrM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".