Dynamic theory and experimental testing in ipsilateral offset dual-motor excitation system
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper addresses unbalanced trajectories of dual-motor vibrating screens by proposing a dynamic theory and experimental testing. First, based on the Lagrange equation, the dynamic model of ipsilateral offset dual-motor excitation system is established. Subsequently, the steady response is worked out by solving the differential equation of motion of the vibrating body. Then, the synchronization condition and synchronization stability criterion of the system are determined employing the small parameter method and the Routh–Hurwitz criterion. Numerical analysis methods are given to reveal the relationship between structural parameters and synchronization characteristics of the vibration system. Moreover, an mechanical–electric coupling model is developed to study dynamic characteristics. The results demonstrate that synchronization condition can be described with capture torque and difference of output torque between motors. The synchronization ability is enhanced by improving installation distance of the motors. Additionally, increasing angle β or decreasing angle θ of the motors is in favor of optimization of centroid trajectory; swing oscillation of the box can be controlled by adjusting the main inclination angle of motors; in such a condition, equilibrium of motion trajectory of system is enhanced. Finally, the validity method for designing vibrating screen is verified through theoretical calculations, simulation analysis, and experiments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it