MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391214682 · doi:10.1093/imamat/hxae002

A bubble model for the gating of Kv channels

2023· article· en· W4391214682 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIMA Journal of Applied Mathematics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicElectrochemical Analysis and Applications
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsGatingBubbleRandomnessPhysicsChannel (broadcasting)Work (physics)MechanicsVoltageStatistical physicsMathematicsComputer scienceThermodynamicsQuantum mechanicsBiophysicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Voltage-gated K$_{\mathrm{v}}$ channels play fundamental roles in many biological processes, such as the generation of the action potential. The gating mechanism of K$_{\mathrm{v}}$ channels is characterized experimentally by single-channel recordings and ensemble properties of the channel currents. In this work, we propose a bubble model coupled with a Poisson–Nernst–Planck (PNP) system to capture the key characteristics, particularly the delay in the opening of channels. The coupled PNP system is solved numerically by a finite-difference method and the solution is compared with an analytical approximation. We hypothesize that the stochastic behaviour of the gating phenomenon is due to randomness of the bubble and channel sizes. The predicted ensemble average of the currents under various applied voltage across the channels is consistent with experimental observations, and the Cole–Moore delay is captured by varying the holding potential.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.597
Threshold uncertainty score0.223

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it