MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391216153 · doi:10.1109/tte.2024.3358566

Integrated Combined-Slip-Based Vehicle and Wheel Dynamic Control for Electric Vehicles

2024· article· en· W4391216153 on OpenAlexafffund
Ehsan Hashemi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSlip (aerodynamics)Control theory (sociology)Vehicle dynamicsAutomotive engineeringTire balanceBrakeEngineeringSlip angleElectronic stability controlStability (learning theory)Electric vehicleComputer scienceControl (management)Aerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A vehicle stabilization control system that integrates vehicle lateral and wheel dynamics and considers a tire combined-slip model for automated driving systems in electric vehicles, is presented. This paper introduces a new prediction model that not only considers lateral force drop by the longitudinal slip, but also takes into account the variation of longitudinal forces due to slip angles during cornering. As confirmed by road experiments as well as high-fidelity simulations, this novel model derivation improves the lateral stability of the autonomous driving significantly through more feasible control actuation satisfying safety and stability constraints. The control system monitors cornering and brake force capacities without having road surface friction information and adjusts slips to minimize tracking error, satisfying stability requirements through a constrained optimization program. The stability of the proposed receding horizon is proved, and the performance of the controller is evaluated in road experiments, in real-time, in various maneuvers on different road surfaces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.794
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Transportation ElectrificationSame topicVehicle Dynamics and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207