MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391218546 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.109.014327

Suppressed electric quadrupole collectivity in <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>Si</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>32</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>

2024· article· en· W4391218546 on OpenAlexafffund
J. Heery, J. Henderson, C. R. Hoffman, A. M. Hill, T. Beck, C S G Cousins, P. Farris, A. Gade, S. A. Gillespie, J. D. Holt, B. S. Hu, H. Iwasaki, S. Kisyov, A. N. Kuchera, B. Longfellow, C. Müller-Gatermann, A. Poves, E. Rubino, Robert D. Russell, Rafaela Nogueras Salinas, A. Sanchez, D. Weißhaar, C. Y. Wu, J. Wu

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. C · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityTRIUMF
FundersNuclear PhysicsNuclear Science and Security ConsortiumScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Nuclear Security AdministrationMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónU.S. Department of EnergyOffice of ScienceUK Research and InnovationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsQuadrupoleCoulomb excitationPhysicsAb initioIsotopeExcitationAtomic physicsNuclear physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lying between O 16 and Ca 40 , the s d shell is well described by robust phenomenological and nuclear theories. In this work, however, we highlight an unexplained reduction in electric-quadrupole strength in the rare isotope Si 32 , studied through sub-barrier Coulomb excitation. It is found that the oblate nature of the deformation is well reproduced, while the absolute scale of quadrupole deformation, however, is inhibited by approximately a factor of 2 compared to theoretical predictions. Through comparison with shell-model and calculations, we present a number of possible explanations for this inhibited E 2 strength. By comparing the results of these calculations to multiple observables, we conclude that there is a reduced role for out-of-space excitations in Si 32 , resulting in a reduction in the corrections normally applied to both models. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.194
Threshold uncertainty score0.650

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1940.117

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. CSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207