MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391225432 · doi:10.54097/1b8d8v02

Technological Advancements and Consumer-Centric Transformation: The Evolution of Online Shopping Platforms

2023· article· en· W4391225432 on OpenAlexaff
L Li

Bibliographic record

VenueHighlights in Business Economics and Management · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransformation (genetics)Technological evolutionComputer scienceBusinessData scienceArtificial intelligenceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In today's rapidly evolving Internet era, online shopping platforms are increasingly adopting new technologies and innovative marketing strategies to optimize spending and increase profits. Integrating emerging advertising media has led to faster and more effective product promotion strategies, helping to spread products rapidly. However, using big data sometimes raises concerns about potential information leakage and privacy invasion, through which sellers can access customers' sensitive personal information. This study provides insight into how online shopping platforms utilize emerging technologies to improve the customer experience and increase sales and advertising effectiveness. By analyzing how new technologies such as virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) are transforming product presentation and shopping experience, this study reveals how online shopping platforms enable more immersive and interactive environments that allow customers to understand and experience products fully. Virtual fitting rooms and 3D simulation displays of products provide customers with a unique shopping experience that helps increase engagement and reduce uncertainty in virtual shopping. In addition, this study looks at the use of big data in online shopping and explores how it affects customer experience and advertising strategies. However, using big data raises questions about privacy and data security, with customers concerned that their sensitive information may be misused.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.922
Threshold uncertainty score0.255

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHighlights in Business Economics and ManagementSame topicTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourFrench-language works237,207