MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391226740 · doi:10.1016/j.ymgmr.2024.101055

Clinical and biochemical phenotypes, genotypes, and long-term outcomes of individuals with galactosemia type I from a single metabolic genetics center in Alberta

2024· article· en· W4391226740 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Nihal Almenabawy, Shalini Bahl, Alyssa-Lyn Ostlund, Shailly Ghai-Jain, Iveta Sosova, Alicia Chan, Saadet Mercimek‐Andrews

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Genetics and Metabolism Reports · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolism and Genetic Disorders
Canadian institutionsAlberta Health ServicesUniversity of TorontoPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreWomen and Children’s Health Research InstituteUniversity of Alberta HospitalUniversity of Alberta
FundersNorthern Alberta Clinical Trials and Research CentreAlberta Health Services
KeywordsGalactosemiaFailure to thriveNewborn screeningGenotypeMedicinePediatricsCohortInternal medicineGeneticsBiologyGalactoseBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Galactosemia type I is an autosomal recessive disorder of galactose metabolism due to galactose-1-phosphate uridyltransferase deficiency, encoded by GALT. To investigate the phenotypes, genotypes and long-term outcomes of galactosemia, we performed a retrospective cohort study in our center. All individuals with galactosemia type I were included. We divided individuals into two groups to compare the outcomes of those treated symptomatically (SymX) and asymptomatically (AsymX). We reviewed electronic patient charts for clinical features, biochemical investigations, molecular genetic investigations, treatments, and outcomes. There were 25 individuals including classic (n = 17), clinical variant (n = 4), and biochemical variant (Duarte) galactosemia (n = 4). Twelve individuals were diagnosed symptomatically (SymX), and 9 individuals were diagnosed asymptomatically (AsymX). We did not include individuals with biochemical variant (Duarte) galactosemia into any of these groups. At the time of the diagnosis, conjugated hyperbilirubinemia was present in 83.3% of SymX group, whereas only 22% of AsymX group. SymX group had hepatomegaly (25%), failure to thrive (33.3%), cataract (16.7%) and sepsis (25%), whereas none of the individuals in the AsymX group had these clinical features. Fourteen variants in GALT were identified including pathogenic/likely pathogenic (n = 12), and likely benign/benign (n = 2) variants. The vast majority of individuals with classic and clinical variant galactosemia were treated with a galactose-lactose-free diet for life (n = 20/21). Intellectual disability was present in 54.5% of the SymX group, and in 37.5% of the AsymX group as a long-term outcome. Tremors were present 50% of the SymX group, and in 22% of the AsymX group as a long-term outcome. Although, intellectual disability and tremors seem to be less common in the AsymX group, there was no statistically significant difference between both groups. Primary ovarian insufficiency was present 50% of the SymX group, whereas in 20% of the AsymX group in post-pubertal females. We report a novel hypomorphic GALT variant (p.Ala303Ser) in one individual with clinical variant galactosemia. We also report an individual with clinical variant galactosemia with normal urine galactitol levels on a normal diet. It seems that newborn screening and early administration of a galactose-lactose-free diet decreases the long-term galactosemia-associated complications but does not prevent them completely. It may be that not all individuals with clinical variant galactosemia may need a galactose-lactose-free diet. It is timely to find new therapeutic strategies that can reduce the frequency of late-onset complications in galactosemia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.183
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Genetics and Metabolism ReportsSame topicMetabolism and Genetic DisordersFrench-language works237,207