Serum S100A8/A9 and MMP-9 levels are elevated in systemic lupus erythematosus patients with cognitive impairment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: Cognitive impairment (CI) is one of the most common manifestations of Neuropsychiatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (NPSLE). Despite its frequency, we have a limited understanding of the underlying immune mechanisms, resulting in a lack of pathways to target. This study aims to bridge this gap by investigating differences in serum analyte levels in SLE patients based on their cognitive performance, independently from the attribution to SLE, and exploring the potential for various serum analytes to differentiate between SLE patients with and without CI. Methods: Two hundred ninety individuals aged 18-65 years who met the 2019-EULAR/ACR classification criteria for SLE were included. Cognitive function was measured utilizing the adapted ACR-Neuropsychological Battery (ACR-NB). CI was defined as a z-score of ≤-1.5 in two or more domains. The serum levels of nine analytes were measured using ELISA. The data were randomly partitioned into a training (70%) and a test (30%) sets. Differences in the analyte levels between patients with and without CI were determined; and their ability to discriminate CI from non-CI was evaluated. Results: Of 290 patients, 40% (n=116) had CI. Serum levels of S100A8/A9 and MMP-9, were significantly higher in patients with CI (p=0.006 and p=0.036, respectively). For most domains of the ACR-NB, patients with CI had higher S100A8/A9 serum levels than those without. Similarly, S100A8/A9 had a negative relationship with multiple CI tests and the highest AUC (0.74, 95%CI: 0.66-0.88) to differentiate between patients with and without CI. Conclusion: In this large cohort of well-characterized SLE patients, serum S100A8/A9 and MMP-9 were elevated in patients with CI. S100A8/A9 had the greatest discriminatory ability in differentiating between patients with and without CI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".