Le multiculturalisme dans tous ses États. Bilan, défis et perspectives sur cinquante ans de multiculturalisme canadien (1971-2021) et ses déclinaisons
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce numéro thématique fait suite à une proposition de Françoise Le Jeune, professeure à Nantes Université et spécialiste de l’histoire de l’empire britannique et de l’Amérique du nord (XVIIIe et XIXe siècles). Depuis 1971, le Canada a fait le choix d’inventer les valeurs de la nation autour du multiculturalisme, aboutissant à la mise en place de politiques d’État multiculturalistes en 1988. Quel bilan et quelles perspectives peut-on dresser de ce projet dit de multiculturalisme d’État aujourd’hui pour le Canada ? Ce numéro rassemble des articles dont les recherches portent un regard critique sur le Canada, pour mieux saisir les succès ou les failles du multiculturalisme canadien, les limites ou défis auxquels il doit faire face aujourd’hui. Il évalue dans quelle mesure il est devenu un marqueur incontournable de l’identité nationale canadienne, ou si, au contraire, il est susceptible de fragiliser le consensus national au Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".