L’approche interculturelle critique ou la déconstruction de l’interculturalisme québécois
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article se donne pour objectif de rendre compte de la fragilité de l’interculturalisme québécois dans l’espace discursif actuel, tout en faisant la lumière sur de nouvelles approches plus critiques en matière d’intégration et de pluralisme, formes de mobilisation qui émanent principalement de réflexions et de pratiques issues du milieu communautaire au Québec. Il s’agira notamment de démontrer comment la philosophie interculturelle québécoise des années 1960 a progressivement mené à la mise en place d’un projet politique puis à une polarisation idéologique autour d’enjeux identitaires linguistiques et religieux. L’émergence récente d’approches critiques, parfois très hétérogènes, entendent poursuivre un objectif commun : la dénonciation, voire le démantèlement de rapports de pouvoir qui caractérisent aujourd’hui l’interculturalisme québécois.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.024 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".