MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391247648 · doi:10.1117/12.3005756

Non-stationary diffraction and defocus correction in optical coherence tomography images

2024· article· en· W4391247648 on OpenAlexaff
Nima Abbasi Firoozjah, Keyu Chen, Alexander Wong, Kostadinka Bizheva

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Coherence Tomography Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOptical coherence tomographyComputer scienceFocus (optics)OpticsCoherence (philosophical gambling strategy)Sample (material)Artificial intelligenceImage qualityDiffractionTomographyComputer visionImage (mathematics)MathematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel method is proposed for correcting aberrations and diffraction-induced artifacts in optical coherence tomography (OCT) images. The method leverages light backpropagation models combined with region-based despeckling and sharpness optimization algorithms to improve overall OCT image quality across a variety of sample types. The algorithm was applied to data acquired using a Line-Field OCT (LF-OCT) system with high numerical aperture (NA) and short depth-of-focus (DOF) Significant improvements were made to images acquired at different depths within various sample types. Such improvement holds the promise of providing ultra-high resolution volumetric OCT data without the need for depth scanning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.758
Threshold uncertainty score0.423

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptical Coherence Tomography ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207