Robust Multi-signal Estimation Framework with Applications to Inertial Sensor Stochastic Calibration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The stochastic calibration of low-cost and consumer grade inertial sensors has recently become very important due to their wide-spread utilization in a multitude of mass-market applications like smartphone and drone navigation. The reason behind this is because if accurate stochastic modeling about the inertial sensor noise is obtained, then the estimation quality of the navigation solution may improve significantly. Generally, the mainstream methods for stochastic calibration consider only a single signal, collected under static conditions, to infer that knowledge. However, it has been observed that even though the stochastic model structure that characterizes each (static) calibration signal remains the same, its parameter values vary from one replicate to another. Even though techniques have been recently proposed to address this in a statistically efficient way, a very important factor has been neglected, namely the influence of outliers on the estimation process. In this paper, a robust multi-signal framework for the stochastic modeling of inertial sensor errors is proposed, which contains two layers of robustness: one that reduces the influence of outliers in each observed signal (data corruption) and one that safeguards the estimation process from the collection of calibration signal replicates with notably different stochastic behaviour compared to the majority (sample contamination). Furthermore, two estimators are defined from this framework, with each encompassing either one or both layers of robustness, and their efficiency in different data contamination scenarios is assessed in a simulation setting. Finally, real data collected from a consumer-grade MEMS-based device are used within a navigation simulator to evaluate the relationship between the quality of the stochastic models obtained by the two robust estimators in different data collection scenarios and the navigation solution stability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".