MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391264227 · doi:10.1016/j.oret.2024.01.019

Deep Learning Models for the Screening of Cognitive Impairment Using Multimodal Fundus Images

2024· article· en· W4391264227 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOphthalmology Retina · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Imaging and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBeijing Municipal Science and Technology CommissionCapital Health Research and Development of Special FundNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsFundus (uterus)BeijingMedicineOptical coherence tomographyOptometryMontreal Cognitive AssessmentOphthalmologyCognitive impairmentArtificial intelligenceCognitionComputer scienceChina

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop a deep learning system capable of identifying subjects with cognitive impairment quickly and easily based on multimodal ocular images. DESIGN: Cross sectional study. SUBJECTS: Participants of Beijing Eye Study 2011 and patients attending Beijing Tongren Eye Center and Beijing Tongren Hospital Physical Examination Center. METHODS: We trained and validated a deep learning algorithm to assess cognitive impairment using retrospectively collected data from the Beijing Eye Study 2011. Cognitive impairment was defined as a Mini-Mental State Examination score < 24. Based on fundus photographs and OCT images, we developed 5 models based on the following sets of images: macula-centered fundus photographs, optic disc-centered fundus photographs, fundus photographs of both fields, OCT images, and fundus photographs of both fields with OCT (multimodal). The performance of the models was evaluated and compared in an external validation data set, which was collected from patients attending Beijing Tongren Eye Center and Beijing Tongren Hospital Physical Examination Center. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: A total of 9424 retinal photographs and 4712 OCT images were used to develop the model. The external validation sets from each center included 1180 fundus photographs and 590 OCT images. Model comparison revealed that the multimodal performed best, achieving an AUC of 0.820 in the internal validation set, 0.786 in external validation set 1, and 0.784 in external validation set 2. We evaluated the performance of the multi-model in different sexes and different age groups; there were no significant differences. The heatmap analysis showed that signals around the optic disc in fundus photographs and the retina and choroid around the macular and optic disc regions in OCT images were used by the multimodal to identify participants with cognitive impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Fundus photographs and OCT can provide valuable information on cognitive function. Multimodal models provide richer information compared with single-mode models. Deep learning algorithms based on multimodal retinal images may be capable of screening cognitive impairment. This technique has potential value for broader implementation in community-based screening or clinic settings. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.793
Threshold uncertainty score0.451

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it