Deep Learning Models for the Screening of Cognitive Impairment Using Multimodal Fundus Images
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop a deep learning system capable of identifying subjects with cognitive impairment quickly and easily based on multimodal ocular images. DESIGN: Cross sectional study. SUBJECTS: Participants of Beijing Eye Study 2011 and patients attending Beijing Tongren Eye Center and Beijing Tongren Hospital Physical Examination Center. METHODS: We trained and validated a deep learning algorithm to assess cognitive impairment using retrospectively collected data from the Beijing Eye Study 2011. Cognitive impairment was defined as a Mini-Mental State Examination score < 24. Based on fundus photographs and OCT images, we developed 5 models based on the following sets of images: macula-centered fundus photographs, optic disc-centered fundus photographs, fundus photographs of both fields, OCT images, and fundus photographs of both fields with OCT (multimodal). The performance of the models was evaluated and compared in an external validation data set, which was collected from patients attending Beijing Tongren Eye Center and Beijing Tongren Hospital Physical Examination Center. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: A total of 9424 retinal photographs and 4712 OCT images were used to develop the model. The external validation sets from each center included 1180 fundus photographs and 590 OCT images. Model comparison revealed that the multimodal performed best, achieving an AUC of 0.820 in the internal validation set, 0.786 in external validation set 1, and 0.784 in external validation set 2. We evaluated the performance of the multi-model in different sexes and different age groups; there were no significant differences. The heatmap analysis showed that signals around the optic disc in fundus photographs and the retina and choroid around the macular and optic disc regions in OCT images were used by the multimodal to identify participants with cognitive impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Fundus photographs and OCT can provide valuable information on cognitive function. Multimodal models provide richer information compared with single-mode models. Deep learning algorithms based on multimodal retinal images may be capable of screening cognitive impairment. This technique has potential value for broader implementation in community-based screening or clinic settings. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".