Language Anxiety of ESL Learners: A Phenomenological Inquiry
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This phenomenological study aimed to investigate the challenges encountered by ESL learners as well as their coping mechanisms in addressing the identified challenges. Using convenience sampling method, the researcher conducted focus group discussion and in depth interview to delve more on the challenges encountered as well as their ways of addressing these difficulties in learning English as a second language. Themes emerged on students difficulties are improper pronunciation, grammatical error, lack of reading comprehension and lack of self-confidence. Participants also revealed that their coping mechanisms are improve English vocabulary, develop reading comprehension skills, practice on speaking English language, and assistance for English language development. Most of the students encounter grammatical errors and improper pronunciation. With these, it is advised that language teachers should provide learning environment that filter anxiety level and promotes learning among ESL students.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it