MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391270436 · doi:10.55849/solj.v1i4.657

Permissible and Prohibited Businesses in Islam

2023· article· en· W4391270436 on OpenAlexaff
Amina Intes, Uwe Barroso, Eladdadi Mark

Bibliographic record

VenueSharia Oikonomia Law Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicIslamic Finance and Banking Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIslamBusinessPolitical sciencePhilosophyTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Business is a very important thing in the economy, Islam sees business as having to be done but must comply with the rules that have been regulated in islam. This article aims to provide information to readers both student who are prospective entrepreneurs, prospective entrepreneurs/ wati so they can understand in theory how they should and should be a businessman in accordance with Islamic teachings. And it is also hoped that this writing will become an enlinghtenment for traders and entrepreneurs. The research method used in this article is descriptive qualitative. The descriptive qualitative technique used is library research, which is data collection by conducting study studies of books, literature, notes, and reports that have to do with the problem being solved. This research also examines written sources such as scientific journals, reference books, literature, etc. related to research studies. And the results of this study are that there are some values that must be applied by business people in doing business including honesty, fairness, oneness, honesty in business, honesty in production, honesty in selling, honesty in gaining profit. While the value in justice is fairness in business, justice in production, fairness in selling, justice in gaining profit. And the next value is the value of oneness, namely oneness in production, oneness in selling and oneness in gaining profit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.583
Threshold uncertainty score0.561

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSharia Oikonomia Law JournalSame topicIslamic Finance and Banking StudiesFrench-language works237,207