Enhancing autonomous vehicle hyperawareness in busy traffic environments: A machine learning approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As autonomous vehicles (AVs) advance from theory into practice, their safety and operational impacts are being more closely studied. This study aims to contribute to the ever-evolving algorithms used by AVs during travel in busy urban districts, as well as explore the potential utilization of AV sensor data to identify safety hazards to surrounding road users in real time. Accordingly, the study incorporates AV data collected from multiple cities in the United States to detect and categorize traffic conflicts that involve the source AVs, as well as conflicts that involve other surrounding road users. Then, a machine learning conflict prediction model is trained with Isolation Forest - Convolutional Neural Network - Long Short-Term Memory (IF-CNN-LSTM) layers. The model receives data in real time in the form of road user trajectories and headings to make an informed prediction of the potential frequency and severity of conflicts three seconds into the future. In addition, the transferability of the trained model to new data and locations is explored to understand the potential compromise in accuracy compared to the effort and cost of retraining. The results show that the proposed model is capable of predicting the possibility of conflict occurrence and conflict severity with high accuracy (sensitivity = 83.5 % and fallout = 11 %). The reported sensitivity of AV conflict prediction ranged between 89 % and 95 %, depending on conflict type, which outperforms most of the existing conflict prediction models. The model is also capable of predicting hazardous conflicts of surrounding road users in real time, with sensitivity values ranging between 82 % and 87 %, affirming the promising capabilities of onboard vehicle sensors in undertaking real-time safety applications. The model also retains good performance when transferred to different data, with the potential to retain nearly 97 % of the source model's performance if sufficient tuning data exists.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".