MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391270893 · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2024.107458

Enhancing autonomous vehicle hyperawareness in busy traffic environments: A machine learning approach

2024· article· en· W4391270893 on OpenAlexaff
Abdul Razak Alozi, Mohamed Hussein

Bibliographic record

VenueAccident Analysis & Prevention · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic and Road Safety
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSensitivity (control systems)Convolutional neural networkRetrainingCategorizationMachine learningArtificial intelligenceData miningEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As autonomous vehicles (AVs) advance from theory into practice, their safety and operational impacts are being more closely studied. This study aims to contribute to the ever-evolving algorithms used by AVs during travel in busy urban districts, as well as explore the potential utilization of AV sensor data to identify safety hazards to surrounding road users in real time. Accordingly, the study incorporates AV data collected from multiple cities in the United States to detect and categorize traffic conflicts that involve the source AVs, as well as conflicts that involve other surrounding road users. Then, a machine learning conflict prediction model is trained with Isolation Forest - Convolutional Neural Network - Long Short-Term Memory (IF-CNN-LSTM) layers. The model receives data in real time in the form of road user trajectories and headings to make an informed prediction of the potential frequency and severity of conflicts three seconds into the future. In addition, the transferability of the trained model to new data and locations is explored to understand the potential compromise in accuracy compared to the effort and cost of retraining. The results show that the proposed model is capable of predicting the possibility of conflict occurrence and conflict severity with high accuracy (sensitivity = 83.5 % and fallout = 11 %). The reported sensitivity of AV conflict prediction ranged between 89 % and 95 %, depending on conflict type, which outperforms most of the existing conflict prediction models. The model is also capable of predicting hazardous conflicts of surrounding road users in real time, with sensitivity values ranging between 82 % and 87 %, affirming the promising capabilities of onboard vehicle sensors in undertaking real-time safety applications. The model also retains good performance when transferred to different data, with the potential to retain nearly 97 % of the source model's performance if sufficient tuning data exists.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAccident Analysis & PreventionSame topicTraffic and Road SafetyFrench-language works237,207