MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Pet dog managemental practices followed by pet dog owners of Kakinada city in Andhra Pradesh

2024· article· en· W4391283260 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
G Sushma, B. Punya Kumari, U Vinod

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHuman-Animal Interaction Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVeterinary medicineAnimal scienceMedicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An empirical study was conducted to identify the level of awareness and practices followed by pet dog owners in Kakinada city, Andhra Pradesh. The study design involved the systemic personal interview of randomly selected 127 dog owners using a well-structured interview schedule through a simple random sampling method. The study revealed that Dog owners mainly provide homemade and commercial (74.01%) food, 4.72% exclusively use commercial foods and none of them were aware of the chocolate toxicity. The majority of them (86.61%) give both vegetarian and non vegetarian foods to their pets 2-3 times a day. Pet owners in this area prefer male (59.05%) dogs over females. People in this area have a preference for the rearing Labrador Retrievers. About 85.83% pet owners were aware of heat detection, and 82.68% were aware of the appropriate period for breeding. The results revealed that, 38.58% of the owners neutered their dogs. Among the respondents who owned breeding dogs, cent percent preferred natural method of breeding by taking female dogs to male dog’s place. Majority (74.02%) of the owners took their dogs for pregnancy diagnosis and preferred both physical examination by the veterinarian and as well as ultrasound scanning (55.91%) for pregnancy diagnosis. The majority (62.99%) of the owners weaned puppies at less than 4 weeks of age. Most dog breeders (87.4%) in Kakinada housed their dogs at home without any separate housing provisions, only 12.6% kept their dogs in Kennels. The present study reveals that 84.25% of dog owners engage in deworming and vaccination with the advice of nearby Veterinarians. The majority of the dog owners (87.19%) own only one dog as a pet, and most (64.57%) of them maintain records of vaccination and disease treatment. Most of the dog owners (73.23%) do not groom hair and trim nails of their pets despite spending more than 3hrs with their pets (77.17%). Awareness of the importance of grooming and nail trimming is lacking. Approximately, 43.31% of owners in the study area take their dogs for exercise for one hour daily, both in the morning and evening. Pet dog insurance was not known to all the respondents. Therefore, there is urgent need to enhance the knowledge of the dog owners regarding scientific breeding practices of pet dogs by effective dissemination of the information based on the needs of the dog owners.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.374 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Animal HusbandrySame topicHuman-Animal Interaction StudiesFrench-language works237,207