Estágios de desenvolvimento econômico e políticas públicas de empreendedorismo e de micro, pequenas e médias empresas (MPMEs) em perspectiva comparada: os casos do Brasil, do Canadá, do Chile, da Irlanda e da Itália Etapas de desarrollo económico y políticas públicas para emprendimiento y micro, pequeñas y medianas empresas (MIPYMEs) en una perspectiva comparada: los casos de Brasil, Canadá, Chile, Irlanda y Italia Stages of economic development and public policies for entrepreneurship and for micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs) from a comparative perspective: the cases of Brazil, Canada, Chile, Ireland, and Italy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Esta pesquisa explora em perspectiva comparada as políticas públicas de empreendedorismo e Micro, Pequenas e Médias Empresas (MPMEs) no Brasil, no Canadá, no Chile e na Itália. A hipótese fundamental é que economias no estágio de inovação tendem a desenvolver mais políticas de empreendedorismo do que as de países no estágio da eficiência. Da mesma forma, países no estágio de inovação tendem a usar menos instrumentos de políticas de MPMEs do que países em estágio de eficiência, quase sempre para incentivar grupos, setores ou regiões em específico. O artigo contribui com a literatura de empreendedorismo ao analisar na prática a convergência/divergência das escolhas de política pública e estágio de desenvolvimento. Esta investigación explora en una perspectiva comparada las políticas públicas para emprendimiento y las micro, pequeñas y medianas empresas (MIPYMES) en Brasil, Canadá, Chile e Italia. La hipótesis subyacente es que las economías en la etapa de innovación tienden a desarrollar más políticas de emprendimientos que los países en la etapa de la eficiencia. Del mismo modo, en los países en etapa de innovación tienden a utilizar menos instrumentos de MIPYMES que países en la etapa de innovación para animar a los grupos, regiones o sectores específicos. El trabajo contribuye a la literatura sobre emprendimiento por analizar la convergencia /divergencia de opciones de política pública y la etapa de desarrollo. This study applies a comparative perspective to the public policies for entrepreneurs and Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) in Brazil, Canada, Chile, and Ireland. The fundamental hypothesis is that economies in the innovation stage of economic development tend to develop more policies for entrepreneurship than countries in the efficiency stage. Similarly, countries in the innovation stage tend to apply fewer policies to MSMEs than countries in the efficiency stage to encourage development in specific groups, sectors, or regions. This article contributes to the literature on entrepreneurship by analyzing the convergence and divergence of the public policy choices at different stages of economic development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".