MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391286019

Estágios de desenvolvimento econômico e políticas públicas de empreendedorismo e de micro, pequenas e médias empresas (MPMEs) em perspectiva comparada: os casos do Brasil, do Canadá, do Chile, da Irlanda e da Itália Etapas de desarrollo económico y políticas públicas para emprendimiento y micro, pequeñas y medianas empresas (MIPYMEs) en una perspectiva comparada: los casos de Brasil, Canadá, Chile, Irlanda y Italia Stages of economic development and public policies for entrepreneurship and for micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs) from a comparative perspective: the cases of Brazil, Canada, Chile, Ireland, and Italy

2013· article· pt· W4391286019 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gilberto Sarfati

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2013
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicIntellectual Capital and Performance Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Esta pesquisa explora em perspectiva comparada as políticas públicas de empreendedorismo e Micro, Pequenas e Médias Empresas (MPMEs) no Brasil, no Canadá, no Chile e na Itália. A hipótese fundamental é que economias no estágio de inovação tendem a desenvolver mais políticas de empreendedorismo do que as de países no estágio da eficiência. Da mesma forma, países no estágio de inovação tendem a usar menos instrumentos de políticas de MPMEs do que países em estágio de eficiência, quase sempre para incentivar grupos, setores ou regiões em específico. O artigo contribui com a literatura de empreendedorismo ao analisar na prática a convergência/divergência das escolhas de política pública e estágio de desenvolvimento.<br>Esta investigación explora en una perspectiva comparada las políticas públicas para emprendimiento y las micro, pequeñas y medianas empresas (MIPYMES) en Brasil, Canadá, Chile e Italia. La hipótesis subyacente es que las economías en la etapa de innovación tienden a desarrollar más políticas de emprendimientos que los países en la etapa de la eficiencia. Del mismo modo, en los países en etapa de innovación tienden a utilizar menos instrumentos de MIPYMES que países en la etapa de innovación para animar a los grupos, regiones o sectores específicos. El trabajo contribuye a la literatura sobre emprendimiento por analizar la convergencia /divergencia de opciones de política pública y la etapa de desarrollo.<br>This study applies a comparative perspective to the public policies for entrepreneurs and Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) in Brazil, Canada, Chile, and Ireland. The fundamental hypothesis is that economies in the innovation stage of economic development tend to develop more policies for entrepreneurship than countries in the efficiency stage. Similarly, countries in the innovation stage tend to apply fewer policies to MSMEs than countries in the efficiency stage to encourage development in specific groups, sectors, or regions. This article contributes to the literature on entrepreneurship by analyzing the convergence and divergence of the public policy choices at different stages of economic development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.134
GPT teacher head0.435
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicIntellectual Capital and Performance AnalysisFrench-language works237,207