MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391291017 · doi:10.32721/ctj.2023.71.4.ustd

Selected US Tax Developments: Canadian Residents Who Are US Citizens May Be Able To Credit Canadian Taxes Against the US Net Investment Income Tax

2022· article· en· W4391291017 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Jonathan Rhein

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale canadienne · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicTaxation and Legal Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInvestment (military)Tax creditEconomicsBusinessIncome taxMonetary economicsPublic economicsPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The US net investment income tax (NIIT, colloquially referred to as the "Obamacare tax" or "Medicare tax") is a 3.8 percent tax on worldwide investment income of US citizens and residents, and applies to interest, dividends, royalties, and other types of investment income. Although US domestic law does not permit a foreign tax credit to be applied against the NIIT, the US Court of Federal Claims recently held that the US-France tax treaty requires the United States to allow a foreign tax credit against the NIIT. While this case may be helpful for US citizens who are residents of other countries that have tax treaties with the United States that include provisions similar to the provision at issue in the case, residents of Canada who are US citizens may have a harder time making the argument that the US-Canada tax treaty requires the United States to allow a foreign tax credit against the NIIT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.285

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0170.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale canadienneSame topicTaxation and Legal IssuesFrench-language works237,207