The Legal Regime of the Secondary Modalities of Constitution of the Real Right of Superficies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
\nThe law problem analysed in this paper regards the atypical situation of the constitution of the real right of superficies, which is materialised in the fact that, in the last paragraph of the article 693 of the Romanian Civil Code there are stipulated two special cases in which this right can be formed. The first one refers to the inscription of the superficies right in the favour of the one that built on the land of someone else, based on the decision of the landowner to give up the right to invoke the accession. The second one presumes the cession in favour of a third party of the right to invoke the accession. Therefore, the new legal framework capitalizes on both previous doctrinal experience and similar provisions of the Quebec Civil Code and includes in the sphere of possibilities of acquiring the right of superficies either a potential right of renunciation or the cession of this right in favour of another party. However, the two situations rise difficulties either by the legal nature of the act of renunciation or by the way the cession is born. This paper analyses the enumerated situations and contains personal opinions in this matter.\n
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".