Unlocking the Therapeutic Potential of Marine Collagen: A Scientific Exploration for Delaying Aging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aging, a natural process occurring in both normal and degenerative conditions, is closely associated with collagen degradation, impacting various bodily systems such as the skin. The continuous aging of the skin, influenced by both intrinsic and extrinsic factors, underscores the importance of collagen in dermatological and cosmetic contexts. Notably, collagen supplements enriched with essential amino acids like proline and glycine along with marine fish collagen have become popular for their safety and effectiveness in mitigating the aging process. To compile relevant literature on the anti-aging applications of marine collagen, a systematic search and analysis of peer-reviewed papers was conducted using reputable databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase, covering publications from 1956 to 2023. From in vitro to in vivo experiments, the reviewed studies elucidate the anti-aging benefits of marine collagen, emphasizing its role in combating skin aging and promoting overall skin health. Many bioactive marine peptides exhibit diverse anti-aging properties, including free radical scavenging, apoptosis inhibition, lifespan extension in various organisms, and protective effects in aging humans. Furthermore, the peptide production of hyaluronic acid is discussed as a mechanism to fortify collagen and enhance skin moisture, contributing to the anti-aging effects of collagen supplementation. The integration of bio-tissue engineering in marine collagen applications is also explored, highlighting its proven utility in addressing skin and bone damage. Insights from this review illuminate the diverse biomedical applications of marine collagen alongside keystone molecular editing tools such as CRISPR, positioning it as a versatile resource in anti-aging interventions. However, limitations to the scope of its application exist. Thus, by delving into these nuanced considerations, this review contributes to a comprehensive understanding of the potential and challenges associated with marine collagen in the realm of anti-aging applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".