MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391300861 · doi:10.2514/6.2024-2151

An Adaptive Seat Suspension System for the Mitigation of Whole-Body Vibration

2024· article· en· W4391300861 on OpenAlexaff
Yimei Wang, Hossein Vatandoost, Ramin Sedaghati

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEffects of Vibration on Health
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuspension (topology)VibrationWhole body vibrationComputer scienceAutomotive engineeringControl theory (sociology)AcousticsEngineeringPhysicsArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the development, and design optimization of a novel MRE-based semi-active seat suspension system to mitigate the whole-body vibration (WBV) transmitted to the helicopter’s pilot. The semi-active seat suspension system includes an MRE-based isolator along with “parallel-series passive springs” to mitigate the vibration transmitted to human body. The proposed suspension system permits relatively large strokes for the suspension system to tolerate the human body’s weight, while maintaining the MRE to be operated within its linear deformation range. To this end, several MRE samples with 25% volume fraction of iron particles were fabricated and characterized under shear mode. A field- and frequency-dependent phenomenological model is developed to predict the MREs’ mechanical properties (storage and loss moduli) as functions of the excitation frequency and applied magnetic field. The proposed model permitted design optimization of a C-shaped MRE vibration isolator. The MRE isolator along with the three passive springs were optimally designed with large strokes of 15mm. Results showed that by increasing the applied current from 0 to 2A, the equivalent stiffness of the adaptive seat suspension increased from 8.94kN/m to 17.5kN/m. The system resonance frequency shift from 1.76Hz to 2.27Hz, corresponding to a frequency shift percentage of 29%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.721
Threshold uncertainty score0.195

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEffects of Vibration on HealthFrench-language works237,207