MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4391301037 · doi:10.2514/6.2024-1967

A Fully-Discrete Nonlinearly-Stable Flux Reconstruction Scheme using Implicit Runge-Kutta for the Navier-Stokes Equations

2024· article· en· W4391301037 on OpenAlexaff
Carolyn M. Pethrick, Sivakumaran Nadarajah

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRunge–Kutta methodsScheme (mathematics)Stability (learning theory)Applied mathematicsControl theory (sociology)Flux (metallurgy)Navier–Stokes equationsComputer scienceMathematicsMathematical analysisPhysicsMechanicsNumerical analysisMaterials scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-order, entropy stable discretizations are able to resolve intricate flow structures robustly. However, they remain prohibitively costly for the needs of the aerospace industry in design and analysis applications. Flux reconstruction (FR) methods increase the linear stability limit for high-order discretizations. This work will describe a fully-discrete, nonlinearly-stable flux reconstruction scheme that has the capability of reducing computational cost by addressing the restrictive time step size needed for stability. We describe the implementation and properties of a fully-discrete entropy stable FR scheme. The fully-discrete scheme retains nonlinear stability properties at large time step sizes for any FR scheme. We present results using the viscous Taylor-Green vortex test case.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows→French-language works237,207→