11-Ketotestosterone and time to castration resistance in patients with recurrent non-metastatic prostate cancer receiving androgen deprivation therapy.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
209 Background: The contribution of 11-oxygenated androgens to disease progression in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for recurrent non-metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) remains unresolved. We hypothesized that evaluating circulating levels of 11-oxygenated androgens, such as the potent androgen receptor (AR) agonist 11-ketotestosterone (11KT), could serve as a potential predictor for the onset of castration resistance (CRPC). Methods: The multi-institutional prospective PROCURE cohort involves 2,026 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for localized PCa. In this cohort, a subset of 145 patients who received ADT therapy for recurrent disease and had available plasma samples post-surgery were included in this study. The effect of therapy on steroid levels was assessed in paired samples obtained before and after the initiation of ADT (n=50), and samples from patients under combined ADT with AR pathway inhibitors, enzalutamide (n=10) and abiraterone (n =15). 11-oxygenated androgens (n=7) and canonical steroids, such as testosterone (T) and dihydrotestosterone (DHT), were quantified by mass spectrometry. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used to investigate relationships of androgen levels with the occurrence of CRPC. Results: 11-oxygenated androgens remained unaffected by ADT, which stands in contrast to the observed changes in T, DHT and other steroids. In men with castrated T levels, 11KT was the most abundant androgen. Elevated 11KT was associated with a sooner time to CRPC ( P=0.023). The 10-year CRPC event-free rate was 63% vs. 84% for 11KT levels above and below the median, respectively. The initiation of enzalutamide had no impact on 11-oxygenated androgen levels, whereas abiraterone significantly reduced 11KT levels owing to the adrenal origin of its precursor. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that 11KT is a significant component of the hormonal profile predictive of an earlier onset of CRPC and inhibition of its production by the CYP17A1 inhibitor abiraterone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".