Survival and fracture risk with radium-223 therapy in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): A real-world analysis.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
50 Background: Radium-223 is a life-prolonging radionuclide therapy for men with bone-predominant metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). It accumulates at sites of high bone turnover with emerging evidence suggesting use of radium-223 increases risk of pathologic fractures. Bone-protective agents (BPAs) reduce skeletal-related events including pathologic fractures in men with mCRPC. We evaluated real-world outcomes of patients treated with radium-223, including the effect of BPA use on pathologic fracture risk. Methods: This was a single institution retrospective cohort study that included patients with mCRPC treated with radium-223 in Manitoba, Canada from 2014 to 2021. Outcomes of interest included incidence of pathologic fracture, pain response, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) response, and overall survival. Kaplan-Meier method was used for time to event outcomes and multivariable Cox regression models were used to adjust for covariates. Results: We identified 92 patients who received radium-223 for mCRPC (Table). Thirty patients (33%) completed 6 cycles of radium-223. Documented pain relief occurred in 39% of patients. For those with elevated ALP at baseline (n = 46), 57% had at least 30% reduction in total ALP. PSA reduction occurred in 29% with 11% having at least 30% reduction in PSA. Median overall survival (OS) was 9.4 months (95% CI 5.8 to 15.9). Of those who did not receive concurrent BPA, 26% developed a pathologic fracture, compared to 3% who received concurrent BPA during a median follow up of 8.1 months. BPA use was associated with significant delay in time to pathologic fracture (median not reached vs. 15.9 months; HR = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.05 – 0.76, p < 0.05) after adjusting for number of bone metastases and corticosteroid use. Conclusions: In this real-world study, concurrent BPA use was associated with significant reduction in risk of pathologic fractures in mCRPC patients receiving radium-223. BPA administration should be considered for patients receiving radium-223. [Table: see text]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".