Can We Predict Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Recipients?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
COPD experiencing difficulties in being separated from the ventilator was visible even if an increase in pH and decrease in _ VE with ECCO2R were no longer observed after 24 hours of treatment.Importantly, no increases in ICU or hospital length of stay or in mortality were observed when ECCO2R was used in difficult-to-wean intubated patients with COPD.Although the VENT-AVOID trial has acknowledged limitations, it suggests that additional studies powered to assess mortality outcomes are warranted to explore the role of ECCO2R to facilitate weaning in patients with COPD exacerbation who had to be intubated and are difficult to wean.However, given the high prevalence of bleeding complications and other adverse events reported with the currently available ECCO2R devices, not only in patients with COPD but also in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (12, 13), it is advisable to address technical issues and enhance the safety of the technique before planning large-scale trials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".