Urban, David V. Milton and the Parables of Jesus: Self-Representation and the Bible in John Milton’s Writings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
comptes rendus 257 nuanced consideration of competing visualities among plural ethnicities in the region engages important Andean issues of materiality and reception.Two final essays explore the marvellously complex, monumental depictions of the Postrimerías (Four Last Things) at the parish churches of Carabuco and Caquiaviri in the Lake Titicaca region.Gabriela Siracusano's analysis of the seventeenth-century series at Carabuco links contemporary texts and sermons with the painted imagery to elucidate narratives that were both local and universal, while Lucía Querejazu Escobari's examination of a similar eighteenth-century series at Caquiaviri locates the paintings within the overall iconographic program of the church and evaluates their political and ideological content in terms of enduring concerns regarding the persistence of Andean "idolatry" and ancestral beliefs.The second part of the volume offers a series of brief but informative iconographic studies penned by several of the authors that include the Passion of Christ, the Immaculate Conception and other Marian advocations, and images of saints and archangels-as well as the famed examples depicting archangels with guns.As an anthology, this volume makes no claim to trace the complete history and full spectrum of colonial painting in the region, yet it is certainly the most extensive treatment of major themes and issues to date, and reproduces in abundance the stunning visual splendor and range of painting in the region.For these reasons, the volume will appeal to students and general readers and will serve as a major scholarly reference for years to come.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".