Amours privées, amours publiques, amours publiées ; l’inscription de divers cercles publics dans quelques avatars des canzonieri pétrarquistes des années 1570–1580
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article propose une lecture des indices qui, dans des recueils imprimés, formulent une adresse à un public restreint et se réfèrent à une circulation préalable des pièces poétiques. Il s’agit d’analyser la tension, du point de vue de la réception par des publics successifs, entre le paradigme de lecture générique du canzoniere et l’inscription dans un contexte éthique et social particulier. Sont ainsi comparés des itinéraires de publication très différents : d’une part, des processus ancrés dans le contexte de la cour royale (Jamyn et Ronsard), et d’autre part, des processus naissant du deuil d’une épouse (Christofle du Pré et Pierre de Brach). Ces recueils qui détournent le cadre énonciatif pétrarquiste et étendent les significations des motifs pétrarquistes permettent d’observer la concurrence entre les attentes herméneutiques liées au genre du canzoniere et celles liées à l’adresse à un lectorat de circonstance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".