Capodieci, Luisa, Estelle Leutrat, Rebecca Zorach (éds.), avec la collaboration de Youenn Morvan. Miroirs de Charles IX
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ambrosiana, showing how Italians connected the charitable deeds of Elizabeth with her spiritual sanctity.Giuseppina Giamportone examines the altar of the Compagnia in the Chiesa dei Santi Martiri in Turin, constructed in 1662.She connects the absence of iconographic elements relating to St. Elizabeth to the emergence of the Marian devotion in the confraternity.Simona Santacroce and Luisella Gioacchino examine early modern biographies of Elizabeth, showing how they initially served as allegorical defenses against Protestantism.Later seventeenth-century biographies of Elizabeth, particularly the comedic play Los terceros de San Francisco by Lope de Vega and Juan Pérez de Montalbán and the panegyric Lo spettacolo by Emanuele Tesauro, served to link the sanctity of Elizabeth with the Duchy of Savoy.Luca Bianco further demonstrates how motifs and tropes of Elizabeth in Lo spettacolo were used to forward the idea of Christine of France as a holy princess.The final paper by Stefania Tagliaferri examines the presence of St. Elizabeth in nineteenth-century literature, where she served to legitimize the privileges of the declining nobility.This diverse and detailed study, informed by social, economic, religious, political, and art history, represents an important contribution to the study of early modern confraternities, as well as the social history of early modern Turin.Two short documentary appendices transcribe relevant archival material from the seventeenth century, and forty-eight colour plates provide an important visual supplement to the text.steven
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.041 | 0.022 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".