Bibliographic record
Abstract
Shakespeare-now a cultural sign worldwide-has inspired humanists and artists in Asian countries; indeed, the tradition of Shakespeare studies in Asian countries is an integral part of world literature and Renaissance studies.Jonathan Locke Hart's edited collection, Shakespeare and Asia, makes an important contribution to these fields.The book is composed of two parts.Essays in the first part concern Shakespeare's works or literary ideas having affinity with the literature of Asia.The second part, "Shakespeare, the Novel, Opera, Adaptations and Film, " includes six essays on literary works that Shakespeare influences.In the first part, Wang Ning examines the historicity of Shakespeare's works and the verisimilitude of literature, and how Shakespeare has inspired Chinese writers, appealing to many examples of tradition, rewriting, and staging in modern Chinese cultural history.Simon C. Estok explores Shakespeare's food from the perspective of ecocriticism in relation to the Korean cultural context, advocating a green Shakespeare.Francis K. H.So discusses Shakespeare in Taiwan, through several characters in Romeo and Juliet, The Merchant of Venice, and As You Like It.In a comparative analysis that includes Chinese elements such as Confucianism, So discovers the affinity between Western culture and Chinese culture in terms of daughters, patrimony, and human nature.Applying a theory from China, Wei Xiaofei tries to solve the question of Hamlet from the stance of ethical literary criticism, establishing the liaison between East and West.Examining metadrama, I-Chun Wang studies two Taiwanese playwrights who adapt Shakespeare and looks at the relationship between dramatic performance and society, contending that "the playwright becomes the person who displays a semiotic domain to decode and to be decoded through selfreflexivity, which refers to the ability to reflect on and assess the relationship between the self and the society" (74).Hart explores the state and otherness through Marlowe's Tamburlaine, forming a geographical conception of the West in relation to Asia, and then discusses Shakespeare's representations of Asian countries in The Merchant of Venice, Macbeth, Othello, and The Tempest.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".