Sauter, Michael J. The Spatial Reformation: Euclid between Man, Cosmos, and God
Bibliographic record
Abstract
comptes rendus 265 la revue Lustrum.À travers le parcours « périégétique » qui nous mène de l'époque classique au XVII e siècle, la production de l'École de Gaza (Jean de Gaza, Procope, Choricius) et les progymnasmata de la période médio-byzantine (Nicéphore Basilakès, Jean Géomètre, et al.) ont toutefois été occultées, une lacune qui témoigne du peu de documentation critique entourant la réception et la pratique des manuels rhétoriques au Moyen âge.On cherchera également en vain les Progymnasmata de Libanios, auteur probable d'un florilège de 30 ekphraseis constituant l'une des plus importantes sommes d'exempla hérités de l'époque tardo-antique.En dépit de ces oublis, l'exercice synthétique que propose cet ouvrage constitue une contribution majeure aux études de réception des traités de rhétorique antiques et ouvre la voie à l'étude de la pratique de ces exercices dans les grandes œuvres de la littérature occidentale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".