Uptake of 18F-AV45 in the Putamen Provides Additional Insights into Alzheimer’s Disease beyond the Cortex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cortical uptake in brain amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) is increasingly used for the biological diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD); however, the clinical and biological relevance of the striatum beyond the cortex in amyloid PET scans remains unclear. A total of 513 amyloid-positive participants having 18F-AV45 amyloid PET scans available were included in the analysis. The associations between cognitive scores and striatal uptake were analyzed. The participants were categorized into three groups based on the residual from the linear fitting between 18F-AV45 uptake in the putamen and the cortex in the order of HighP > MidP > LowP group. We then examined the differences between these three groups in terms of clinical diagnosis, APOE genotype, CSF phosphorylated tau (ptau) concentration, hippocampal volume, entorhinal thickness, and cognitive decline rate to evaluate the additional insights provided by the putamen beyond the cortex. The 18F-AV45 uptake in the putamen was more strongly associated with ADAS-cog13 and MoCA scores (p < 0.001) compared to the uptake in the caudate nucleus. Despite comparable cortical uptakes, the HighP group had a two-fold higher risk of being ε4-homozygous or diagnosed with AD dementia compared to the LowP group. These three groups had significantly different CSF ptau concentration, hippocampal volume, entorhinal thickness, and cognitive decline rate. These findings suggest that the assessment of 18F-AV45 uptake in the putamen is of unique value for evaluating disease severity and predicting disease progression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".