MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391319304 · doi:10.47852/bonviewjdsis42022111

The Evolving Landscape of Oil and Gas Chemicals: Convergence of Artificial Intelligence and Chemical-Enhanced Oil Recovery in the Energy Transition Toward Sustainable Energy Systems and Net-Zero Emissions

2024· article· en· W4391319304 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Data Science and Intelligent Systems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnhanced oil recoveryEfficient energy useEnergy engineeringProcess engineeringWorkflowComputer scienceEngineeringPetroleum engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chemical-enhanced oil recovery (EOR) is a field of study that can gain significantly from artificial intelligence (AI), addressing uncertainties such as mobility control, interfacial tension reduction, wettability alteration, and emulsifications. The primary objective of this paper is to introduce an integrated framework for AI and chemical EOR for energy harvest operations. Central emphasis is placed on the energy transition, with the aim of expediting the development of cleaner energy harvesting systems and attaining the goal of net-zero emission. To do so, we present how the energy transition is changing the manufacturing of the chemicals for EOR application. For this, the uncertainty associated with materials' design and critical role of the simulators for transferring the laboratory experiences into full-field implementations is discussed. The concept of digitalization and its impact on energy companies are highlighted. The role of digital twin in simulators integration is discussed, emphasizing how increased data access can help design more tolerant chemicals for harsh reservoir environments using real-time data. Also, we discuss how the chemical suppliers, research institutes, startups, and field operators can benefit from self-leaning and robotic laboratories for chemicals manufacturing. Moreover, this paper explores how including AI perspectives can improve our understanding of developing chemical formulations by blending hybrid capabilities. This approach contributes to making energy production more sustainable and aligning with the goal of zero emissions. A workflow is presented to demonstrate how the integration of AI and chemical EOR can be used for both hydrocarbon production and other energy transition operations, such as carbon capture, utilization and storage, hydrogen storage, and geothermal reservoirs. The outcome of this paper stands as a pioneering effort that uniquely addresses these challenges for both academia and the industry and can open many additional doors and identify topics requiring further investigations. Received: 21 November 2023 | Revised: 22 January 2024 | Accepted: 29 January 2024 Conflicts of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to this work. Data Availability Statement Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.571
Threshold uncertainty score0.292

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it