MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391329461 · doi:10.2118/217759-ms

New Advancements in Flowback Analysis for Rapid Diagnostics and Integrated Hydraulic Fracture Optimization

2024· article· en· W4391329461 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsARC Resources (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydraulic fracturingPetroleum engineeringFracture (geology)Computer scienceGeologyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract There is a large technological gap between the end of the frac and until operators accumulate long term production data to perform a meaningful lookback. Over the last 10 years flowback analysis (FBA) has emerged as a successful technology to address this problem by utilizing only commonly gathered production test data. FBA provides operators with a low-cost technology to perform rapid diagnostics and rapid lookbacks within days of opening the well to flow. In this paper, several case studies from prolific North America tight and shale plays will be presented to demonstrate the immense value of FBA for rapid diagnostics and rapid lookbacks. The presented case studies will focus on the interpretation of FBA results to identify hydraulic fracture optimization opportunities and improve future well performance. A new set of physics-based correlations are also demonstrated, which link effective stress (from DFIT), fracture area/stimulated volume (from FBA) and long-term pressure-normalized productivity, to extend the application of FBA to a large-scale field development. It allows operators to use extensive horizontal well base to predict and select optimal completion design ahead of pumping and to high grade the land base for full field development, forecasting and budget planning purposes. FBA is closing a significant technological gap in diagnostics methods from the time well has been completed to the time until we gather enough long-term production data to perform lookback or design evaluation. By integrating FBA diagnostics into hydraulic fracture optimization workflows, operators can promptly evaluate the efficacy of their fracture treatments and identify wells that are likely to underperform long-term within days of finishing pumping, enabling them to apply these insights to subsequent wells or pads. FBA provides results 6-12 months faster than other low-cost diagnostics (i.e. rate-transient analysis on long-term production data). By incorporating FBA into hydraulic optimization workflows, operators can quickly identify numerous commonly observed detrimental effects including small or unexpected fracture geometry, fracture skin damage, insufficient or degrading conductivity, and poor cluster efficiency. Through rapid diagnostics, operators are able to quickly identify optimization opportunities and drive their learning curve ahead of their capital spending.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.895
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it