MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391331344 · doi:10.1215/00141801-10673426

Down the Warpath to the Cedars: Indians’ First Battles in the Revolution

2023· article· en· W4391331344 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jake Breadman

Bibliographic record

VenueEthnohistory · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoryAncient historyGenealogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Down the Warpath to the Cedars is the most recent book-length treatment of the Battle of the Cedars, an engagement fought between Great Britain, the burgeoning United States, and a multiplicity of Indigenous nations around present-day Quebec at the beginning of the American Revolution.Anderson’s primary aim is to illustrate the vital, independent role played by the Haudenosaunee Six Nations, the Seven Nations of Canada, and the Mississauga at the Cedars, a goal at which he succeeds. He appropriately emphasizes complex inter- and extrarelations between various Haudenosaunee and Mississauga peoples, and he rightly notes, “Each village responded differently, based on its interest and spheres of influence.” There are, for example, contrasting reactions between the prominent pro-American Kahnawake faction led by Atiatoharongwen of Kahnawake and the predominantly pro-British Lake of Two Mountains Kanestake, both of which belong to the Seven Nations of Canada. Anderson superbly demonstrates the motivations behind their support for the respective cause. Atiatoharongwen, for example, fought against the British during the Seven Years’ War, and the Kanestake were generally pro-British because of their proximity to Montreal and British goods, which allowed them to maintain regional power. Anderson reminds readers that these allegiances were not static: “Even as war raged in their neighborhood, the Indians made it clear in several episodes that they were not beholden to either warring power. They flexed their independence, tested allies, and exploited the situation to their advantage.”Anderson situates his work within the growing “Native Ground” historiography. British inability to exert control over allied warriors during and after the Battle of the Cedars well illustrates this point. Indigenous warriors, whether they served the King or Congress, exerted immense autonomy on the battlefield.Deeper engagement with Indigenous social history by Anderson may have further improved Down the Warpath to the Cedars. While Anderson notes that scalping was a cultural act unpalatable to Euro-colonial moral standards, he does little to explain the rationale behind it besides stating, “For Indians, scalps were a key means to physically demonstrate success on the warpath.” A deeper discussion of scalping would have been beneficial at highlighting its significant cultural meaning. Scalping was a practice by which Haudenosaunee warriors avenged the death of the fallen so they could pass on to the afterlife. Haudenosaunee peoples might display scalps in their homes as a reminder that the fallen warrior’s death was avenged and that they were peacefully at rest. Anderson should have noted that wartime trophy-taking (of which scalping may be categorized) is not unique to Indigenous peoples of North America but is found among all peoples, including Euro-Americans. Indeed, Euro-Americans also scalped in eighteenth- and nineteenth-century warfare. Lacking the cultural understanding of scalping in Haudenosaunee society may leave readers with a negative perception of the warriors.There is too much reliance on Euro-American primary sources that discuss Indigenous warfare in Down the Warpath to the Cedars. Speaking on warriors’ preference to flee under cannon fire, Anderson notes, It was the Americans’ misfortune that their artillery proved so inaccurate. If the guns inflicted any Indian casualties, they might have made a difference in the fort’s ultimate fate. A contemporary source described commonly accepted Indian strengths and weaknesses, noting that they were “excellent men for fighting in the woods,” but that the “first cannon makes them scamper like so many dogs.” Historian John Mahon similarly concluded that Native warriors “could rarely bring themselves to bear up long under artillery fire.” (81)There is little attempt to explain why warriors were prone to run from cannon fire, and, instead, readers might to attribute it to cowardice. Here, Anderson might have furthered his argument, stating that Indigenous propensity to flee under cannon fire sprang from their desire to diminish casualties, preserve their men, and exert their autonomy on the battlefield.Overall, Down the Warpath to the Cedars is necessary reading for anyone interested in New Military History, the history of the American Revolution and Indigenous involvement therein, and the Haudenosaunee and Mississauga peoples of the late eighteenth century.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.767
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEthnohistorySame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207