Arand, Charles, Erik H. Herrmann, and Daniel L. Mattson, eds. From Wittenberg to the World: Essays on the Reformation and Its Legacy in Honor of Robert Kolb
Bibliographic record
Abstract
comptes rendus 191 on travelling women in the context of contemporary travel guides and conduct books, which presented them as suspicious, dishonest, and unchaste.In recent decades, the subject of women and travel has been explored by scholars in a number of ways; however, the essays in this compilation tackle the gender gap that existed in the foundational studies by demonstrating that travel was not only culturally significant, it was also a physical movement locally and globally during the "Age of Discovery" (4-5).They answer important questions pertaining to women's agency as "voluntary" and "involuntary" travellers.They discuss the gendered challenges of travel and how women's agency was documented in historical archival sources and imagined in the literary texts by their contemporaries.This collection is a must read for scholars of interdisciplinary history.For junior historians, this work is an exposure to a global movement of women travellers and their experiences and can be a superb asset in a number of diverse projects.These stories place women in the context of larger issues surrounding the early modern world-beyond their local cities and, what was considered at the time, domestic spaces.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".