MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391334681 · doi:10.57745/dfw5ls

Tensile properties of cement stabilized soils: experimental data

2023· other· en· W4391334681 on OpenAlexaff
Mario Castaneda-Lopez, Thomas Lenoir, Jean-Pierre Sanfratello, Luc Thorel

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2023
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Canadian institutionsColas (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCementUltimate tensile strengthSoil waterMaterials scienceGeotechnical engineeringComposite materialGeologySoil science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The data presented here encompass the experimental preparation and results of Indirect Tensile Strength (ITS) tests on two Cement Stabilized Soils (CSS). Both materials were treated with variable cement contents, degrees of compaction and water contents were tested after several curing times. Preparation followed the French guideline for soil treatment. Cement type is CEM II/A-LL 42.5 R. ITS of non-treated (NT) soils are also included in the dataset.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.797
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)Same topicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil StabilizationFrench-language works237,207