MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391337085 · doi:10.1080/23322705.2024.2303267

The Canada Declaration for a Human Trafficking and Slavery Free Canada: Justice or Just Words?

2024· article· en· W4391337085 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Holly Wood

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Human Trafficking · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSex work and related issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeclarationEconomic JusticeHuman traffickingPolitical scienceCriminologyLawSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In April 2023, The Canada Declaration for a Human Trafficking and Slavery Free Canada was unveiled and signed by select members of Canada’s anti-human trafficking movement at the Human Rights Museum in Winnipeg, Manitoba. The Declaration sets out several items for Canada’s attention, hoping to end all forms of modern slavery in Canada in the coming years. While the Declaration has good intentions behind it, this critique sets out to identify and discuss some of the critical issues within it and offers suggestions on how organizers, politicians, and Canada’s leading anti-human trafficking organizations can turn performative rhetoric into real change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.883
Threshold uncertainty score0.848

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0310.024
Scholarly communication0.0140.004
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0120.019
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Human TraffickingSame topicSex work and related issuesFrench-language works237,207