Novel Three-Phase Buck-Boost Inverter With Reduced Input Current Ripple and No Short-Circuit and Open-Circuit Faults
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article proposes a new single-stage three-phase buck-boost inverter and control scheme, which remarkably reduces both the low and high-frequency ripple components in the input current. The low-frequency ripple component is eliminated by phase-shifting the output three-phase voltages by 120°. The high-frequency ripple component is decreased by doubling the effective switching frequencies and lowering the voltages of the input inductors. The proposed inverter has buck-boost dc-ac conversion ability and contains only six active switches. It is short-circuiting free and can avoid the reverse recovery losses of the body diodes of themosfets. The proposed inverter has better spectral performance and has a lower distortion in the output waveforms due to no delays (equivalent to dead-time in the traditional three-phase inverter) in the switching signals. To validate the performance and advantages of the proposed inverter, detailed analytical, simulation, and experimental results are reported. Experiments have been conducted with a 1.5-kW laboratory prototype at a 50 kHz switching frequency for the line-line output voltage of 110–220 Vrms/60. At the end, integration of inductors is also suggested to decrease the magnetic volume.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".