PA-iMFL: Communication-Efficient Privacy Amplification Method Against Data Reconstruction Attack in Improved Multilayer Federated Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recently, big data has seen explosive growth in the Internet of Things (IoT). Multi-layer FL (MFL) based on cloud-edge-end architecture can promote model training efficiency and model accuracy while preserving IoT data privacy. This paper considers an improved MFL, where edge layer devices own private data and can join the training process. iMFL can improve edge resource utilization and also alleviate the strict requirement of end devices, but suffers from the issues of Data Reconstruction Attack (DRA) and unacceptable communication overhead. This paper aims to address these issues with iMFL. We propose a Privacy Amplification scheme on iMFL (PA-iMFL). Differing from standard MFL, we design privacy operations in end and edge devices after local training, including three sequential components, local differential privacy with Laplace mechanism, privacy amplification subsample, and gradient sign reset. Benefitting from privacy operations, PA-iMFL reduces communication overhead and achieves privacy-preserving. Extensive results demonstrate that against State-Of-The-Art (SOTA) DRAs, PA-iMFL can effectively mitigate private data leakage and reach the same level of protection capability as the SOTA defense model. Moreover, due to adopting privacy operations in edge devices, PA-iMFL promotes up to 2.8 × communication efficiency than the SOTA compression method without compromising model accuracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".